IPPS-A DL HR Professional / Payroll Specialist Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the IPPS-A DL HR Professional / Payroll Specialist Exam with interactive quizzes and learning tools. Understand the core functionalities and enhance your skills. Boost your confidence for the official test!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


When is a Commander’s approval necessary in the disciplinary process?

  1. Before reporting any action

  2. At the time of the Article 15

  3. After the action is processed

  4. During the evaluation phase

The correct answer is: At the time of the Article 15

A Commander’s approval is necessary during the time of the Article 15 because this is a critical stage in the disciplinary process often involving non-judicial punishment for minor infractions. The Article 15 pertains to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which allows commanders to impose disciplinary action without a trial. During this process, the Commander assesses the facts and circumstances of the alleged offense, which requires their approval before any disciplinary action can be formally taken. The Commander’s approval at this stage ensures that due process is followed, the rights of service members are respected, and that the punishment is proportionate to the misconduct. Moreover, it emphasizes the Commander’s role in maintaining discipline and order within their unit, guiding the accountability process in line with military regulations. In contrast, the other options either imply a different stage in the disciplinary process or misunderstand the Commander’s role in relation to Article 15 actions. For example, reporting any action or processing an action without the Commander’s prior approval would undermine the authority and control they have in enforcing discipline. The evaluation phase pertains to assessing performance rather than directly influencing the disciplinary measures under an Article 15.